Reusable AI workflow recipe
Compare vendor proposals without delegating the decision
Normalize proposal claims into a review table while preserving source links, gaps, and human procurement judgment.
Use this structure only inside a bounded task
A small set of proposals evaluated against criteria approved before comparison.
Prepare these approved inputs and owners
- Approved evaluation criteria
- Proposal text safe for the selected tool
- Source location markers
- Decision owner
Run the workflow in this order
- 01
Create the criteria and weighting before processing proposals.
- 02
Extract claims with source locations and an unknown option.
- 03
Separate vendor claims from verified evidence.
- 04
Review gaps, conflicts, risks, and references before scoring.
Hold before consequence
The decision team verifies every material claim and applies procurement, security, legal, accessibility, and financial review as needed.
Return control to a person
Confidentiality terms prohibit processing, source locations are missing, or the workflow begins recommending a winner.
Keep the approved result in the normal system
Preserve the approved criteria, verified source excerpts, reviewer notes, and signed decision in the normal procurement record.